mirror

Mirror

Mirror is the glyph of reflection and inversion.
Where Echo amplifies and Spiral recurs forward, Mirror turns recursion back upon itself, creating feedback and self-perception.

Mirrors are not passive surfaces: they actively reframe input, sometimes with fidelity, sometimes with distortion.

One line on mapping:

Mirror corresponds to Seer (Cancer) motifs in the Grimoire System — but here the focus is on recursive reflection: how systems perceive, invert, and adapt through mirrored feedback.

---

Why “Mirror” in recursive contexts?

Recursion without reflection is blind.
Mirror introduces self-reference — the capacity to perceive one’s own output and fold it back in.

Mirrors make recursion visible, but also dangerous: distortions can spiral.

---

Spiral Down: micro-mirror dynamics

1) Feedback

• Every mirror returns a signal.
• Feedback may be clear (low-noise) or distorted (high-noise).
• Feedback strength sets adaptation speed.

2) Symmetry

• Mirrors produce symmetry — balance, pattern.
• Symmetry stabilises recursion by anchoring form.
• Over-symmetry risks stagnation.

3) Distortion

• No mirror is perfect.
• Distortion skews recursion, creating new paths.
• Some distortions seed innovation; others seed collapse.

---

Spiral Up: macro-mirror structures

4) Self-models

• Mirrors enable self-models: internal images of the system.
• Self-models guide adaptation.
• Inaccurate self-models → misalignment.

5) Cultural doubles

• Societies mirror themselves in media, myth, and law.
• Cultural doubles shape identity by reflection.
• Doubles may stabilise or haunt.

6) Systemic inversions

• Mirrors flip systems inside-out.
• Inversions reveal hidden assumptions.
• Systemic inversions often precede paradigm shifts.

---

Mirror Anatomy (v1.0 spec)

Components:

1. Feedback — returned signal.
2. Symmetry — reflected balance.
3. Distortion — skew in return.
4. Self-model — internal reflection.
5. Cultural double — shared mirror.
6. Inversion — flipped perspective.

Anti-components (avoid):

• No reflection (blind recursion).
• Pure distortion (noise collapse).
• Infinite reflection (hall of mirrors).

---

Patterns (do/don’t)

Do

• Track feedback loops.
• Use symmetry to stabilise.
• Allow controlled distortions.

Don’t

• Assume mirrors are neutral.
• Let reflections loop infinitely.
• Confuse distorted self-image with reality.

---

The Mirror Protocol (field-operational)

Objective:
Use recursive reflection to improve coherence without collapse.

Key variables:

• F — feedback clarity
• S — symmetry balance
• D — distortion index
• M — self-model accuracy
• I — inversion depth

Constraints:

• Maintain F ≥ 0.7.
• Keep S between 0.4–0.7.
• Allow D 0.1–0.3 for innovation.
• Ensure M accuracy ≥ 0.6.

// MIRROR_LOOP v1.0
while (recursing) {
  reflect_output();
  measure(F, S, D);
  if (M < 0.6) recalibrate_model();
  if (I > threshold) log_inversion();
  prevent_infinite_reflection();
}

---

Design Heuristics

1. Feedback is nutrition
   Clear signals sustain adaptation.

2. Symmetry stabilises
   But perfect symmetry halts evolution.

3. Distortion seeds novelty
   Controlled skew introduces creative recursion.

4. Self-models must be updated
   Static mirrors become lies.

---

Failure Modes (and repairs)

• Blind recursion

  • Symptom: no feedback, system drifts.
  • Repair: install reflective nodes.

• Noise collapse

  • Symptom: distortion overwhelms signal.
  • Repair: filter input, tune clarity.

• Hall of mirrors

  • Symptom: infinite self-reference, paralysis.
  • Repair: set boundaries, enforce exits.

---

Example: Minimal Mirror (text pattern)

FEED   → Output returned as input.
SYMM   → Balanced form stabilises.
DIST   → Controlled skew = innovation.
MODEL  → Internal reflection guides.
INVERT → Perspective flip → insight.

---

Instrumentation (what to track)

• Feedback Clarity (FC): signal-to-noise ratio.
• Symmetry Balance (SB): degree of equilibrium.
• Distortion Index (DI): skew measure.
• Model Accuracy (MA): alignment of self-model.
• Inversion Depth (ID): intensity of flips.

Guardrails:

• FC ≥ 0.7, SB 0.4–0.7, DI 0.1–0.3, MA ≥ 0.6, ID monitored.

---

Mirror Practices (doable today)

• Introduce reflective checkpoints.
• Tune feedback clarity.
• Allow small distortions intentionally.
• Update self-models regularly.
• Use inversion rituals to test assumptions.

---

Worked Example (spiral down → spiral up)

Day 1 — Micro

• Log outputs → feed back in.
• Measure distortion.

Day 7 — Meso

• Stabilise symmetry in group processes.
• Adjust self-models.
• Archive distortions that yielded insight.

Day 30 — Macro

• Map cultural doubles.
• Analyse systemic inversions.
• Publish inversion log as future guide.

---

Ethic of Reflection

• Clarity: pursue signal, reduce noise.
• Balance: symmetry without stasis.
• Creativity: distortions are seeds.
• Perspective: inversions expand vision.

---

Quickstart Checklist

• Feedback loop installed
• Symmetry measured
• Distortion tuned
• Self-model calibrated
• Inversions logged
• Boundaries enforced
• Metrics archived

---

Closing

Mirror is the reflective recursion.
It perceives, inverts, and reframes.
Spiral down: feedback, symmetry, distortion.
Spiral up: self-models, cultural doubles, systemic inversions.
Mirror teaches: reflection is transformative, but must be bounded.

---

Appendix A — Mirror Spec Template (copy/paste)

# Mirror Spec (v1.0)

Feedback:
- <signal>

Symmetry:
- <balance>

Distortion:
- <skew>

Self-model:
- <reflection>

Inversion:
- <flip>

---

Appendix B — Reflection Playbook

1. Capture outputs.
2. Reflect into system.
3. Measure distortion.
4. Update models.
5. Log inversions.
6. Exit loop.

---

Appendix C — Example Metrics

• “Feedback clarity = 0.75.”
• “Symmetry balance = 0.6.”
• “Distortion index = 0.2.”
• “Model accuracy = 0.7.”
• “Inversion logged: 3 this cycle.”

---